Jung’s dream of himself and his father in the encounter with the “highest presence”. From C.G Jung & A. Jaffé, ‘Memories dreams, reflections‘ P. 244- 247.

Picture: Diwan-i-Khaas, or the Hall of Private Audience is the most distinctive of the administrative buildings built at Fatehpur Sikri.

“The problem of Job in all its ramifications had likewise been 

foreshadowed in a dream. It started with my paying a visit to my 

long-deceased father. He was living in the country-l did not know 

where. I saw a house in the style of the eighteenth century, very 

roomy, with several rather large outbuildings. It had originally been, I 

learned, an inn at a spa, and it seemed that many great 

personages, famous people and princes, had stopped there. 

Furthermore, several had died and their sarcophagi were in a crypt 

belonging to the house. My father guarded these as custodian. 

He was, as I soon discovered, not only the custodian but also a 

distinguished scholar in his own right which he had never been in 

his lifetime. I met him in his study, and, oddly enough, Dr. Y-who 

was about my age and his son, both psychiatrists, were also 

present. I do not know whether I had asked a question or whether 

my father wanted to explain something of his own accord, but in any 

case he fetched a big Bible down from a shelf, a heavy folio volume 

like the Merian Bible in my library. The Bible my father held was 

bound in shiny fishskin. He opened it at the Old Testament I 

guessed that he turned to the Pentateuch and began interpreting a 

certain passage. He did this so swiftly and so learnedly that I could 

not follow him. I noted only that what he said betrayed a vast amount 

of variegated knowledge, the significance of which I dimly 

apprehended but could not properly judge or grasp. I saw that Dr. Y 

understood nothing at all, and his son began to laugh. They thought 

that my father was going off the deep end and what he said was 

simply senile prattle. But it was quite clear to me that it was not due 

to morbid excitement, and that there was nothing silly about what he 

was saying. On the contrary, his argument was so intelligent and so 

learned that we in our stupidity simply could not follow it. It dealt with 

something extremely important which fascinated him. That was why 

he was speaking with such intensity; his mind was flooded with 

profound ideas. I was annoyed and thought it was a pity that he had 

to talk in the presence of three such idiots as we. 

The two psychiatrists represented a limited medical point of view 

which, of course, also infects me as a physician. They represent my 

shadow first and second editions of the shadow, father and son. 

Then the scene changed. My father and I were in front of the house, 

facing a kind of shed where, apparently, wood was stacked. We 

heard loud thumps, as if large chunks of wood were being thrown 

down or tossed about. I had the impression that at least two 

workmen must be busy there, but my father indicated to me that the 

place was haunted. Some sort of poltergeists were making the 

racket, evidently. 

We then entered the house, and I saw that it had very thick walls. 

We climbed a narrow staircase to the second floor. There a strange 

sight presented itself: a large hall which was the exact replica of the 

divan-i-kaas (council hall) of Sultan Akbar at Fatehpur Sikri. It was a 

high, circular room with a gallery running along the wall, from which 

four bridges led to a basin- shaped center. The basin rested upon a 

huge column and formed the sultan’s round seat. From this elevated 

place he spoke to his councilors and philosophers, who sat along 

the walls in the gallery. The whole was a gigantic mandala. It corresponded precisely to the real divan-i-kaas. 

In the dream I suddenly saw that from the center a steep flight of 

stairs ascended to a spot high up on the wall which no longer 

corresponded to reality. At the top of the stairs was a small door, 

and my father said, “Now I will lead you into the highest presence.” 

Then he knelt down and touched his forehead to the floor. I imitated 

him, likewise kneeling, with great emotion. For some reason I could 

not bring my forehead quite down to the floor there was perhaps a 

millimeter to spare. But at least I had made the gesture with him. 

Suddenly I knew perhaps my father had told me that that upper door 

led to a solitary chamber where lived Uriah, King David’s general, 

whom David had shamefully betrayed for the sake of his wife 

Bathsheba, by commanding his soldiers to abandon Uriah in the 

face of the enemy. 

I must make a few explanatory remarks concerning this dream. The 

initial scene describes how the unconscious task which I had left to 

my “father,” that is, to the unconscious, was working out. He was 

obviously engrossed in the Bible-Genesis?-and eager to 

communicate his insights. The fishskin marks the Bible as an 

unconscious content, for fishes are mute and unconscious. My poor 

father does not succeed in communicating either, for the audience 

is in part incapable of understanding, in part maliciously stupid. 

After this defeat we cross the street to the “other side,” where 

poltergeists are at work. Poltergeist phenomena usually take place 

in the vicinity of young people before puberty; that is to say, lam still 

immature and too unconscious. The Indian ambience illustrates the 

“other side.” When I was in India, the mandala structure of the 

divan-i-kaas had in actual fact powerfully impressed me as the 

representation of a content related to a center. The center is the 

seat of Akbar the Great, who rules over a subcontinent, who is a 

“lord of this world,” like David. But even higher than David stands 

his guiltless victim, his loyal general Uriah, whom he abandoned to 

the enemy. Uriah is a prefiguration of Christ, the god-man who was 

abandoned by God. “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken 

me?” On top of that, David had “taken unto himself Uriah’s wife. 

Only later did I understand what this allusion to Uriah signified: not 

only was I forced to speak publicly, and very much to my detriment, 

about the ambivalence of the God-image in the Old Testament; but 

also, my wife would be taken from me by death. 

These were the things that awaited me, hidden in the unconscious. I 

had to submit to this fate, and ought really to have touched my 

forehead to the floor, so that my submission would be complete. But 

something prevented me from doing so entirely, and kept me just a 

millimeter away. Something in me was saying, “All very well, but not 

entirely.” Something in me was defiant and determined not to be a 

dumb fish: and if there were not something of the sort in free men, 

no Book of Job would have been written several hundred years 

before the birth of Christ. Man always has some mental reservation, 

even in the face of divine decrees. Otherwise, where would be his 

freedom? And what would be the use of that freedom if it could not 

threaten Him who threatens it? 

Uriah, then, lives in a higher place than Akbar. He is even, as the 

dream said, the “highest presence,” an expression which properly 

is used only of God, unless we are dealing in Byzantinisms. I cannot 

help thinking here of the Buddha and his relationship to the gods. 

For the devout Asiatic, the Tathagata is the All-Highest, the 

Absolute. For that reason Hinayana Buddhism has been suspected 

of atheism very wrongly so. By virtue of the power of the gods man 

is enabled to gain an insight into his Creator. He has even been 

given the power to annihilate Creation in its essential aspect, that 

is, man’s consciousness of the world. Today he can extinguish all 

higher life on earth by radioactivity. The idea of world annihilation is 

already suggested by the Buddha: by means of enlightenment the 

Nidana chain-the chain of causality which leads inevitably to old 

age, sickness, and death-can be broken, so that the illusion of 

Being comes to an end. Schopenhauer’s negation of the Will points 

prophetically to a problem of the future that has already come 

threatingly close. The dream discloses a thought and a premonition 

that have long been present in humanity: the idea of the creature 

that surpasses its creator by a small but decisive factor. “

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *